<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anti-Republican</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grabourparty.org/the-anti-republican/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grabourparty.org/the-anti-republican/</link>
	<description>We are a nation of Individuals, working together, not a bunch of disparate groups, fighting for entitlements and unearned privilege.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:43:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://grabourparty.org/the-anti-republican/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grabourparty.org/?p=334#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Good points (&amp; thanks for the comment!). You&#039;re spot-on about the problems facing the Democratic leadership. The 2006 and 2008 election gains were not due to a leftward shift in the nation, but rather a  reaching out (at the time) to moderate Democrats. And yes, now we&#039;re seeing an abandonment of that outreach. 

The GOP would do well to take notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points (&#038; thanks for the comment!). You&#8217;re spot-on about the problems facing the Democratic leadership. The 2006 and 2008 election gains were not due to a leftward shift in the nation, but rather a  reaching out (at the time) to moderate Democrats. And yes, now we&#8217;re seeing an abandonment of that outreach. </p>
<p>The GOP would do well to take notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contrarian_Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://grabourparty.org/the-anti-republican/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian_Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grabourparty.org/?p=334#comment-27</guid>
		<description>There are worse things for the Republican Party (and the country, for that matter) than Barack Obama being reelected in 2012.

If our aim as a movement is simply to prevent Obama&#039;s reelection, then it will really amount to nothing...even if he loses reelection.

Put simply:  it&#039;s the ideas, stupid.  We need to get the ideas right.  We need to be about ideas.  And we also need to not be afraid of being about ideas.

Obviously, when a group grounds themselves in ideas, it necessarily means that people who don&#039;t share those philosophies will be put off.  That&#039;s OK.

But, as the liberals are finding out right now, if a movement gets so consumed with the acquisition of power that it forgoes its ideas and ideals in the pursuit of power, that will ultimately fail them.  They&#039;re all befuddled right now how the majorities they&#039;ve won can&#039;t produce a healthcare reform that they&#039;ve long lusted after.

The reason is obvious to me:  they made a conscious decision to embrace non-liberals as a means to regaining a Congressional majority.  They also made a conscious decision to nominate a president who would talk as a moderate to get elected, but would try to govern decidedly farther left once in office.

And it&#039;s not working for them.  In fact, it likely threatens the integrity of their coalition entirely....because the liberals&#039; are smelling blood and coming around to realizing that it&#039;s their fellow Democrats who are keeping them from feasting.

Conservatives shouldn&#039;t follow their lead simply to bolster the chances of a Republican resurgence.  I want a Republican resurgence.  But I don&#039;t want it if it means having to count on a bunch of panty-waists who really don&#039;t share my ultimate goals or visions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are worse things for the Republican Party (and the country, for that matter) than Barack Obama being reelected in 2012.</p>
<p>If our aim as a movement is simply to prevent Obama&#8217;s reelection, then it will really amount to nothing&#8230;even if he loses reelection.</p>
<p>Put simply:  it&#8217;s the ideas, stupid.  We need to get the ideas right.  We need to be about ideas.  And we also need to not be afraid of being about ideas.</p>
<p>Obviously, when a group grounds themselves in ideas, it necessarily means that people who don&#8217;t share those philosophies will be put off.  That&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>But, as the liberals are finding out right now, if a movement gets so consumed with the acquisition of power that it forgoes its ideas and ideals in the pursuit of power, that will ultimately fail them.  They&#8217;re all befuddled right now how the majorities they&#8217;ve won can&#8217;t produce a healthcare reform that they&#8217;ve long lusted after.</p>
<p>The reason is obvious to me:  they made a conscious decision to embrace non-liberals as a means to regaining a Congressional majority.  They also made a conscious decision to nominate a president who would talk as a moderate to get elected, but would try to govern decidedly farther left once in office.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not working for them.  In fact, it likely threatens the integrity of their coalition entirely&#8230;.because the liberals&#8217; are smelling blood and coming around to realizing that it&#8217;s their fellow Democrats who are keeping them from feasting.</p>
<p>Conservatives shouldn&#8217;t follow their lead simply to bolster the chances of a Republican resurgence.  I want a Republican resurgence.  But I don&#8217;t want it if it means having to count on a bunch of panty-waists who really don&#8217;t share my ultimate goals or visions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
